this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

13368 readers
2 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you can't see that writing readable code is part of the means to that end, I don't know what to tell you. If nobody can maintain the codebase because it's a mess of spaghetti logic and 20-deep dependency trees (I'm looking at you, every JavaScript project I've ever seen), the end product is going to suffer while also making every single engineer working on it want to leave.

This is not a controversial take in professional software development.

Funny, it sure seems like "maintainability should not be a priority" is a pretty controversial take to me.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You are making a lot of assumptions. You don’t know what my product is, how it is developed, what it’s used for, what its lifecycle is. Whether improving maintainability or code quality would be a net benefit, and whether using type script would be a possible solution.

You also didn’t bother to find out.

You just charge at me guns blazing, trying to string me up for heresy.

Funny, it sure seems like "maintainability should not be a priority" is a pretty controversial take to me.

How many things can you prioritize?

In my world we prioritize one. And that not the one.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

In my world we prioritize one. And that not the one.

Then I'm really glad I don't live in that world.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In my world we prioritize one.

Weird. In most cases priorities change as the situation demands. The application doesn't matter when it comes to maintainability. Tech debt will take down any application if you keep ignoring maintainability at the expense of just delivering more and more. You sound more like a manager than a developer.

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even their excuses if a “24h only event app” don’t hold water

Even in that case, a business would be wanting to make many of those apps, and this commenter is arguing making a new one from scratch every time over massively simplifying things with quality reusable code.

Even their own example shows how terrible it is an idea to deprioritize code quality/readability.

[–] someacnt@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I guess they are running some kind of shovelware company with constant bluffings.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe, but you can push it really far before the breaking point is reached.