this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
37 points (64.8% liked)

Uplifting News

11356 readers
592 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Occidental Petroleum is investing in billion-dollar projects to suck carbon dioxide out of the sky. The effort is raising hopes — and eyebrows

By Daniel Estrin, Camila Domonoske

3-Minute Listen / Transcript available

https://www.npr.org/2023/09/08/1198373683/sucking-carbon-dioxide-out-of-the-sky-is-moving-from-science-fiction-to-reality

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

for example a system using some sort of Alge

Wait, you're making a big fuss over the type of natural photosynthesis we should use? Seriously?

People commenting against the carbon capture as featured in the article argue about using natural ways instead and "tree" is just a shorthand for some, just as I used the broad term "plants".

Now don't come and start splitting hairs like "But actually, algae are different from plants because the cells that comprise algae are not able to differentiate into different plant parts like stems, roots, and leaves, so I'm arguing for something completely different."

Most plants aren't suitable for permanent reduction of Carbon we would need way to much area, alge is however very efficient, some also want to use bacteria, but that may be risky.

And yes, trees are important, but not the best (or if we are honest, Meaningful) way to solve the carbon problem.

Another option would be to make lots of alcohol from plants and store it somewhere permanently. (ethanol is just a very compact carbohydrate)

And further there might be industrial ways to take out carbon on mass permanently, we are just not yet shure.

Anyway, the first priority should be to reduce released of more carbon into the atmosphere.