this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
112 points (95.9% liked)

Uplifting News

11288 readers
199 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] natedog526@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (24 children)

This is really cool. Is this kind of tech being made available in cars, too?

[–] SpacePirate@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

No— it is more viable to set up cryogenic hydrogen infrastructure at an airport than replacing our gas stations with hydrogen stations along our roads today. Additionally, the amount of cooling, insulation, and pressurization equipment required will almost certainly be far too large and expensive to fit in a $20-30k passenger vehicle.

Realistically, if we assume a decarbonized future, it’s seeming that battery electric will be used in most small passenger vehicles (cars and trucks today), whereas hydrogen will be used in heavy equipment (construction, extraction, military) and aviation.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social -2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's effectively the same though, if the electricity for the small vehicles is generated by burning hydrogen

[–] hamster@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a fuel cell, it doesn't "burn" hydrogen.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You wouldn't really need fuel cells at a power plant though, would you? Or are there advantages I'm unaware of?

[–] TheChurn@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Fuel cells can be more efficient than combustion because of direct electrification. With combustion, there needs to be a boiler, turbine, etc and that adds to the losses through the system.

At industrial scale, it is possible a turbine and boiler is probably the better bet, because the technology is very mature and large fuel cells may pose extra challenges with sourcing the membranes. It would need a more in-depth cost analysis.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)