this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
1093 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29077 readers
8 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If the performance weakness continues for a week or two, the agency would start recommending decreasing spend with Reddit or directing it to other platforms.

After the blackout, we will be closely monitoring user behavior on Reddit and guide clients when we can unpause,โ€ said Freddy Dabaghi, managing director at Stagwell-backed Crispin Porter Bogusky, which has asked clients to stop campaigns, depending on their client goals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] OofShoot@beehaw.org 90 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If I were world dictator I would just make advertising illegal. It's the perfect dictator move. Simple policy that's hard to enforce which will almost certainly have unintended consequences. But God damn do I hate advertising.

[โ€“] Steeve@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Your wish has been granted, all small businesses have gone bankrupt because nobody knows they exist and since the only form of advertising left is undercover guerilla advertising campaigns every post on every platform is secretly an advertisement!

[โ€“] Belgdore@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think people should be allowed to promote products and services, but those promotions should not be given any more weight than any other kind of post. The problem is when advertisers are allowed to buy spots on a site.

[โ€“] Steeve@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that just turn into who can afford the most vote manipulation on their reddit posts?

[โ€“] TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that how it works now anyway, in addition to regular ads?

[โ€“] Steeve@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong!

[โ€“] OofShoot@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahh! Oh no! Who could have ever foreseen these consequences??

[โ€“] coldredlight@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is such a bizarre and creepy industry. I support you for world dictator!

[โ€“] Beliriel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The problem is that it is basically impossible to clearly differentiate from reviews which are a good and necessary thing. Pay someone to review your product and what now?

[โ€“] Magrid@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

don't complain if all the free service become paid...

[โ€“] Gravelsack@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I honestly think I'd prefer that they just let me pay them outright rather than trying to use me as bait for advertisers. The expectation that everything should be free leads to what we see today

[โ€“] Magrid@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

meh, good point but i'd prefer some reasonably placed ad (not like those website that have 99% ad and 1% content) instead of paying for something that maybe i'll never use again

Yea I wouldn't mind If some of these instances had like one stickied post at the top for a paid ad If that was enough to pay for most of these server costs

[โ€“] Alpagu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I agree with you.

[โ€“] nif@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

You ever though about where the money from advertisers comes from? I would pay for Google if I would then pay less for products that waste money on "marketing" by paying millions to Google.

[โ€“] edgerunneralexis@dataterm.digital 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing is that there aren't significant direct production costs per user for technology services like there are for material items, just overall maintenance costs that only scale noticeably with a large increase of new users, so it would actually be possible to pay for infrastructure and salary costs and all of that with just a percentage of your overall userbase being subscribed and subsidizing the rest. This is actually a monetization strategy that's working out for some privacy focused services like ProtonMail. So it would be necessary to convince some users to sign up but not necessarily all of them.

[โ€“] Sunforged@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The public broadcasting model.

Shout out to KEXP.org

[โ€“] arin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

sadly adverts are what allows some things to be free to consumers, it's the funding that supports the content that people consume. It's what it is for now, in the future maybe there would be better merit systems funded by tax or something if humans get together and stop being greedy.