this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
1354 points (91.8% liked)

Memes

45545 readers
1071 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1354
JBP has got u bro (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by TokyoMonsterTrucker@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

Need a plate of generic, insipid platitudes with a giant helping of bad science and misogyny?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

operating completely on their conclusions and personal ideas instead of the actual data they began with

Do you have a source for Peterson having done this?

[–] FunctionFn@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/hSNWkRw53Jo?si=rCJA_3-QaANHSQX9

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

shortly and succinctly

The video is three hours long!

[–] FunctionFn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's the joke he makes in the video.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Critical thinking and listening to him speak.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you're asking is like proof that I've made this comment, you don't need me to show you that I wrote it because the evidence is automatic based on your ability to comprehend what I'm saying.

Jordan Peterson makes conclusions based on evidence and then uses them to argue his points. The proof is you just need to observe the facts he uses (and I'm being generous here, assuming the data isn't taken out of context or something) and then listen to his arguments to discern when he's using what the data suggests to explain his point versus when he's using the conclusion he drew from the data to explain his point.

I think you'll find it's more often the latter than you initially realized, the man is good at talking in circles both because it makes it difficult to call him out on his bullshit as well as providing an air of expertise and intelligence.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

What you're asking is like proof that I've made this comment

No. What I'm asking for is links or references to the material which you used to form your opinion. Not necessarily all of it but at least something which supports what you're saying. That's what's meant by the word "sources" in this context.

proof is you just need to observe the facts he uses

I'm asking you where I can observe his uses.

listen to his arguments

I'm asking you where I can listen to such arguments.