Technology

59092 readers

6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

557

X plans to collect biometric information, job, education history for safety, security, and identification purposes. (thehackernews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by s1vgm@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Based on your consent, we may collect and use your biometric information for safety, security, and identification purposes," The revised policy of X(Twitter) is expected to go into effect on September 29, 2023.

The thing is, biometric data is permanent and can't be changed. If we share that with X, it could mean lifelong privacy risks. And seriously, I can't think of a single reason why Elon needs to know where I went to high school for data security purposes.

People keep talking about leaving Twitter, but when will they actually do that? I guess they'll just keep putting up with it, and I don't see that changing anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue here isn’t that Elon wants your biometric data.

No, that is the issue. Everyone can decide if they want to or not. I assume that most here are smart enough not to.

The issue is that there will be a bunch of absolute idiots who freely give him their data.

If people want to give that info away, then who am I to stop them?

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I think it's naive to frame it as "wanting to give data" but more that they're allowing themselves to be exploited because many simply don't even know what's in the policy, there are many who concede that they can't do without the platform, and then simply folks who don't know better. I highly doubt there's any significant number of people who understand the policy and happily consent even if they could easily give up the platform instead.

So I think they're both problems. A platform needing data beyond what's necessary to provide the service AND that most people will either concede defeat or not know better.