this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
5 points (69.2% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2115 readers
1 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A publication by The Atlantic going over his works:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/04/the-illusion-of-reality/479559/

My immediate intuition is that this is just bad philosophy disguised as pseudoscience, and from a philosophical perspective none of this makes sense. Am I wrong here? I would like insights.

He believes in so-called "conscious realism", which believes that matter does not exist, and in fact, only consciousness exists.

Here's a critical analysis of some of his stuff: https://philarchive.org/archive/ALLHCR

Edit: Please don't downvote if you think this guy is a nerd, I am skeptical of him myself, but please, upvote so a particularly strong of constitution comrade can detail their opinions and dunk on him

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's a popsci author. I have no idea why anyone is bothering responding to that post lmao

[–] WIthoutFurtherDelay@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do popsci authors have a reputation?

My mental health has been repeatedly ruined by scientists reporting similarly ground-breaking and kind of shaky findings. Am I supposed to... not freak out about any supposed scientific fact that gets more than 1000 upvotes on Reddit?

deng stare Fuck

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do popsci authors have a reputation?

Like in general? They are usually well educated, and sometimes are tenured profs or whatever, but a lot of the time they make wild claims that are deeply ignorant of philosophy, etc, and/or are completely non-falsifiable (I.e. A waste of time). As long as the idea is catchy, they will find their audience though usually not respect from their own peers.

My mental health has been repeatedly ruined by scientists reporting similarly ground-breaking and kind of shaky findings. Am I supposed to... not freak out about any supposed scientific fact that gets more than 1000 upvotes on Reddit?

I'm not exactly sure what you mean, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. Unfortunately, the science or philosophy which filters through into pop culture is generally either sensational or misrepresented.

[–] WIthoutFurtherDelay@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

look at me over here, assuming any part of hellworld works. what a stupid

I feel like the person had legitimate spiritual beliefs in the thread