this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
233 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59346 readers
7625 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
233
Apple already shipped attestation on the web, and we barely noticed (httptoolkit.com)
submitted 1 year ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] realharo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Can you post any source at all that would back your claims? Or any technical details at all?

Neither the actual proposal https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/blob/main/explainer.md#what-information-is-in-the-signed-attestation, nor the article itself seem to show that there would be a difference when it comes to privacy.

The entire problem with this proposal is that it limits client choice, similar to how Google Play integrity API on Android restricts some apps from running on rooted/unlocked phones.

That same problem obviously also exists in Apple's implementation.