this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
274 points (92.0% liked)

World News

32316 readers
1397 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They aren't that dangerous as a weapon of war. The uranium is depleted, as the name suggest. The alternative is heavy metal, which is also dangerous to breathe in. It's war and it sucks for health. Maybe there shouldn't have been an invasion...

[–] Babs@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903104/ this shit is still causing birth defects in Iraq. This is Ukraine's future now.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

And so do other heavy metals. What do you suggest they use that won't have negative health impacts (which is ironic for something designed to kill, but whatever)?

[–] CombatLiberalism@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any heavy metal causes similar issues. Heavy metal will be used, whether it's uranium or something else. Should they just stop shooting?

[–] CombatLiberalism@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unironically yes. A peace deal was in the works last year until, according to the Ukranian Pravda, Boris Johnson pressured Zelensky not to go through with it. This would have stopped the fighting and resulted in some withdrawal of Russian troops, but since the West is more interested in weakening their geopolitical rivals and helping the weapons industry rake in profit than ending the war, they squashed any possibility of that happening.

[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago

No, Ukraine didn't want to give up but they were becoming desperate. Boris Johnson came in to let them know the West was finally willing to offer some support. Ukraine giving up would not have resulted in the withdrawal of russian troops from their newly conquered territory

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Uranium is a very dangerous heavy metal, it just isn't radioactive.

[–] MoreAmphibians@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depleted Uranium is definitely radioactive. It's depleted but there are still radioactive isotopes in it. It's relatively same to handle until it's fired and some of it turns to dust. The dust is both poisonous and radioactive. The toxicity of it is probably worse than the radiation but they're both still bad.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

The radioactivity is a problem its just like, not significant compared. Sorry my b

[–] CombatLiberalism@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nowhere did I make the claim that it was, that doesn't change a thing

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm replying to the person replying to you

[–] CombatLiberalism@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

My bad, I got the colors of the bars mixed up