this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
37 points (83.6% liked)
Technology
59311 readers
4513 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The thing falls apart at the "small number of subfolders" thing. To really offload shit, there'd be dozens of subfolders, making the whole thing cumbersome.
Besides, you'd need to shuffle stuff around constantly, ("is this a project or is it finished?) making it hard to find, making the whole thing obsolete.
You'd still need to name and tag and categorize anything behind the subfolders. At that point, you can just ditch the topevel folders and have everything in a system like paperless or something.
Someone who has issues with sorting and categorizing will not profit from that system at all, just create a mess in 4 folders. So it's just one of those systems that is only good if you are already good at sorting and this don't need a system like that in the first place.
Hmmm, thanks for the thoughts. Any better mental frameworks for organization?
If you have five things that are related, put them in a folder. Repeat. Eventually you end up with maybe ten distinct folders.
I use this method and the only place where there isn't some slight categorisation going on is the projects folder, because these are relatively short lived and then archived in their respective category again. For example university stuff has its own Area and Archive folder because otherwise it would be too much.
You can always argue that productivity methods like this don't work, because some certainly don't work for some people or some special workflows. But these methods can always be changed or just discarded. I've read a few books on productivity stuff and found some middle ground that works well for me, just like everyone should do if that interests them.