this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
282 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
482 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
282
Fairphone 5 Released (shop.fairphone.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by baseless_discourse@mander.xyz to c/technology@beehaw.org
 

With 5 years of OS support and 8 years of security update.

Related threads:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] timkenhan@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Also:

  • lack of 3.5mm jack
  • EVEN BIGGER size

At this point, they're just following the trend.

[–] kritzel@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not bigger, it's even a bit thinner than fairphone 4. Screen is slightly bigger though

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With bigger they probably didn't mean the thickness, but it's size. Width and height. Personally I wouldn't even mind if it would be thicker.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

10.5mm thick.

Fairphone 4 was 10.5mm thick.

Much thinner, yes.

[–] dzire187@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why wouldn't they? Their goal is to create a fair phone. Not a niche phone for a few geeks.

[–] timkenhan@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Because that few geeks is their actual market right now.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

Jack isn't really a niche thing. It's as mainstream as it gets.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, and I'm still a little surprised, even after the 4.

Are they really aiming for mainstream consumers? Because, I don't know, but I don't think they reach mainstream people at all.
Who they reach is those who are explicitly searching for this kind, techies, and they also have pretty different needs than the mainstream.

I mean, I think it's ok that they are making phones like these.
But what's weird is that they are not making phones for techies, who are their current audience, as I see.
I understand that it's costly to have different variants, but at least there would be 2 or 3, which are actually distinct in their features, for the different audiences. No need for different SoC, but like there's this one for the mainstream when that catches on. But then another for techies with jack, a smaller and normal screen (which means square, without camera hole, front camera is distinct if there at all) and less cameras on the back, maybe other diffs too like IR blaster or double sim and microSD. It could also have a different look, like shiny instead of glossy. I mean, it's a different audienve, the preferred looks will be most probably be different too.. and while I don't dislike how the non-screen parts of the 5 look like, it's not my cup of tea.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

And not including charger which you of course can buy for extra €25. It would be fair if the charger was free with every phone. Make it optional if you want to claim it's because of environment, but make it free if someone wants it with your phone.