this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
92 points (95.1% liked)

Programming

17366 readers
457 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
92
Let's talk about Zig (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by Blackthorn@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have been reading about this new language for a while. It's a C competitor, very slim language with very interesting choices, like supporting cross platform compilation out of the box, supports compiling C/C++ code (and can be used as a drop in replacement for C) to the point in can be used as replacement of (c)make and executables are very small.

But, like all languages, adoption is what makes the difference. And we don't know how it goes.

Is anyone actually using Zig right now? Any thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Its a neat language, very simple. Has a somewhat simple approach to codegen at compile time, which is both a boon and a curse; you can do a lot with it, and not get too deep into footgun territory, but once you hit the limits of what you can do, you're pretty much stuck there.

The syntax and other features are very nice, and it makes rather small binaries. I'd say its comparable to Nim in this area.

Sadly, it also suffers the same problems Nim suffers: dearth of libraries.

[–] technom@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Sadly, it also suffers the same problems Nim suffers: dearth of libraries.

That might change once the language stabilizes. Imagine creating a library now and the language changes breaking it.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

would transpilation of C libraries help with the lack of libraries however?

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

In theory yes, but it becomes a problem of ergonomics. The transpiled library feels like a transpiled library, it doesn't match the conventions of Nim/Zig. The best ports/wrappers/whatever typically use the C lib for all the heavy lifting and unique things, and build their own interface, that matches conventions of the calling language