this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
224 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3249 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Quantum 'yin-yang' shows two photons being entangled in real-time::The stunning experiment, which reconstructs the properties of entangled photons from a 2D interference pattern, could be used to design faster quantum computers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No spooky action at a distance

[–] ToyDork@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

More like "no measurement without action" and "action = modification" but I get the reference, yes.

Sadly, IIRC, measuring an entangled particle on one end changes the result on that end, despite the other end trying to be the one that changes it.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don’t think there’s really any “changing” going on. The state of both entangled particles are unknown until one is measured, but I highly doubt that the act of measuring one suddenly determines the other’s state. They were already in those states, but before measurement it was an unknown variable which could be treated as a superposition. Once one is measured, then you know the state of the other entangled particle. Not because the act of measuring one affects the other (see: spooky action), but simply because the nature of entangled particles means the other would have to have to be the opposite of what you measured.

There’s no remote interaction, it’s simply mutual information

At least, that’s my take

Edit: this is why we can’t use entanglement for FTL communication. It just doesn’t work like that

[–] Valeranth@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

This is a common misunderstanding due to trying to think of things classically. I'd recommend "the road to reality" by Penrose if you want a better understanding.

Also it is not why we cannot use entanglement for FTL info, but you'll understand that more once you understand entanglement better.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)