this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
489 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37740 readers
783 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, this is a terrible and senseless pontification. They could have always bundled an ad-blocker without having it enabled out-of-the-box.

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure they could have.

But why would they?

Just because you, clearly, disagree with my opinion doesn’t make it terrible or senseless.

The strength of your conviction, or in which you convey it, isn’t a stand-in for rational arguments and logic based debate.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago

But why would they?

Because it would be one very interesting marketing point? For a browser that promotes itself as "focused on protecting users" and "not selling you out", having a built-in (even if not enabled by default) ad-blocker would make a lot more sense than adding integration with Pocket.

rational arguments and logic based debate.

There is nothing logical about claiming "Firefox is a browser and browser need to render the page as is". First, even that were true it does not require them to enable the ad-block by default. , Second, this definition is contrived and seems picked up just to give a rationalization that gives them some moral ground about their omission. We could just as easily say something like "a web browser is the user agent to access the www and as such it can always modify the web page in favor of the user. Why is that you choose to go for a definition that just happens to favor the business of their biggest source of revenue?