Technology

37603 readers

652 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

A decentralized, blockchain-based messaging network for safer communications (techxplore.com)

submitted 1 year ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Researchers from several institutes worldwide recently developed Quarks, a new, decentralized messaging network based on blockchain technology. Their proposed system could overcome the limitations of most commonly used messaging platforms, allowing users to retain control over their personal data and other information they share online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Electronic voting, maybe? But for most cases a transparently ran centralized ledger should work better.

[–] Helluin@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

electronic voting is a bad idea regardless of any blockchain integration

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Voting on a blockchain is a great way to enable outright purchasing of elections. If I can prove I voted a certain way, I can sell my vote.