this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
489 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37740 readers
755 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You look deep enough at any company and you will find a lot of shit you don't like.

Go live off the land in the woods if you don't want to support shitty companies.

Otherwise STFU

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

OK, but it's also a pretend privacy browser that doesn't actually protect or respect your privacy.

[–] El_Rocha@lm.put.tf 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The browser as is right now is open source and has way better defaults for privacy than Firefox (currently it seems it is the best browser in this aspect. see: https://privacytests.org/private.html ).

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Do you think AD Block Plus to be non privacy oriented because it shows you non invasive ads? No ads I've seen in the browser ever seen like they're targeted. As for crypto, it's anti privacy as the blockchain tracks everything you do on it.... So yeah any of the crypto stuff they did isn't that bad TBH and it is also OPT in...

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah right if you can’t do literally everything perfect you shouldn’t try! cool cool cool

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not what I said. Here is an example I love Pantera, the lead singer should be beat for some of the shit he has said over the years, am I going to stop listening to Pantera? Fuck no

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

If he’s a piece of shit, then, yeah, maybe you should stop listening to them. That’s totally your decision, and I don’t really care either way, but it’s not like you’re doing some moral good by not refusing to listening to them. Do what feels right for you, and I will do what feels right for me.

I stop watching things with actors I think are pieces of shit. I stop listening to bands with members I think are pieces of shit (Brand New anyone?). So yeah, I’d probably stop listening to Pantera (personally/were I a fan). Again, you do you.

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your take would be acceptable if a perfectly viable alternative like Firefox didn't exist. Since it does, how about you STFU?

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I am a Firefox user both mobile and on PC. I'm just tired of people saying don't use this because of the person working on it.

I enjoy Pantera, the lead singer should have the shit beat outa him for this G's he has said but does that mean I am going to stop listening to Pantera? Fuck no

The less people using Chrome (even if they are chromium based browsers) the better

[–] MentalEdge@ani.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"working towards something better is pointless, everything is shit anyway"

Hey, switching to a less shit shitty option, is still an improvement.

If the only way you're willing to accept improvement, is by fixing it all at once or nothing at all, you'll never solve anything.