this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
348 points (90.7% liked)

Atheism

4026 readers
104 users here now

Community Guide

Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.

Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable

Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!

Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
348
You google it if you like. You won't find it. (midwest.social)
submitted 1 year ago by Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to c/atheism@lemmy.world
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No such thing. Any ideology based and unprovable and unverified claims is a mistake by definition.

Given that religion is the root of past major civilizations which we are built on I’d say we wouldn’t have science without it. Hardly a mistake in my opinion. We might still be beating each other in the head with rocks without religion.

You're mistaken on both counts, I'm afraid. Please see http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CI/CI001.html and subsequent pages.

This doesn’t disprove intelligent design. People still argue we are a simulation within science. That’s a form of intelligent design. As is sending a spacecraft that terraforms the beginning of the world and steers throughout history. There are plenty of ways in which a god could have formed us.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 year ago 
No such thing. Any ideology based and unprovable and unverified claims is a mistake by definition.

Given that religion is the root of past major civilizations which we are built on I’d say we wouldn’t have science without it.

We wouldn't have science without oxygen either, and that doesn't mean that science owes its existence to oxygen. The post-hoc fallacy runs rampant in your assertion.

Hardly a mistake in my opinion.

Is religion based in unverified and unverified claims? Yes. That's by definition a mistake. I don't care about how useful or convenient it is or it was in the past; I only care about whether is true or not, and if we're justified in accepting it based on that. Accepting untruths for convenience is always a mistake.

We might still be beating each other in the head with rocks without religion.

That nonsense would be hilarious if it wasn't tragic.