this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
348 points (90.7% liked)

Atheism

4026 readers
104 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm tempted to go and find a Unitarian or Secular church because of this. I believe singing in a choir is one of the most calming activities I've ever had in my life.

[–] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I go to church but don’t fully buy into church and I don’t think you have to. For instance when they talk about god, I replace with universe. science hasn’t disproven it.

Jesus. Maybe son of god or maybe just someone with really good morals and wanted us to love each other. Either way someone we should hold up and adore.

I was defined atheist at one point in my life. Now I’m somewhere in the middle. Churches and religion offers a lot of good things. Community being my favorite. Americans don’t find many reasons to get together but church is like heyo it’s potluck time every other week. Delicious food and good people.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe son of god or maybe just someone with really good morals and wanted us to love each other. Either way someone we should hold up and adore.

Adoration is intrinsically disgusting.

I was defined atheist at one point in my life. Now I’m somewhere in the middle.

Nonsense. Belief in a god is a binary proposition.

[–] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nonsense. Belief in a god is a binary proposition.

Life isn’t black and white. Neither is religion, at least not a religion I’d follow. Those who make it black and white are we have hatred and division.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Life isn’t black and white.

Nobody said anything about "life". Nice strawman you have there.

Neither is religion, at least not a religion I’d follow.

The more important question is why any rational being would want to follow a religion, but I digress.

I'm answering specifically to this assertion you made:

I was defined atheist at one point in my life. Now I’m somewhere in the middle.

The assertion "I believe in God" is true or false. It cannot be anything else.

[–] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The assertion "I believe in God" is true or false. It cannot be anything else.

Right but what is God? There’s a myriad of different answers to that and most religions a God is not a being as much an idea or force.

This is where it not being black and white comes into play. Answering that question with True of False means you believe my god is what you believe God to be. That’s likely not the case.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Choose one god. Tell me if you believe in it or not. The answer is binary.

And your answer is a cop-out. God with a capital G, the god called God, is understood to be the Judeochristian deity. But whatever, you're obviously not discussing in good faith so let's end it here.

[–] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not a cop out it’s just not black and white. You seem to really be struggling with the fact someone could be in a state between believing in God and not.

You’d be surprised how many Christians will tell you they struggle with believing from time to time. The ones who will admit it at least. Many do and to many God is different from one to the next.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a struggle on my part; the whole idea is stupid.

If I ask you if you believe that dogs are real, the only options are yes or no. You cannot be unaware of the state of your own belief.

[–] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A dog is a real tangible thing. Easy to say yes. You’d have to be delusional not to believe it.

God isn’t a person or thing, you can’t touch it, and the evidence is old written and many translated texts. However there is an obvious gap in our understanding of how and why we are here. So is God involved, was there a guiding hand can totally be a question that hasn’t fully resolved itself in my mind.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago

the evidence is old written and many translated texts

That is not evidence. They're stories in a book that have not been corroborated by anything real later.

When you talk about evidence you need to refer to objetive, material, reproducible evidence that can be examined by skeptics, and that is valid both for the scientific method and before the law.

If your notion is unverifiable by definition, is not worth considering.

So is God involved, was there a guiding hand can totally be a question that hasn’t fully resolved itself in my mind.

You don't have any legitimate reason to ask the question in the first place. The whole idea makes no sense.