this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
154 points (91.0% liked)

GenZedong

4186 readers
25 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't think preserving investments is going to be the priority there, rather the focus will likely be on preserving jobs. What I think is most likely to happen is that large chunks of the real estate industry become nationalized.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nationalization isn't a miracle solution.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a pretty good solution that worked many times in the past. Rich investors are going to lose some money on this, but that's about it and frankly that's not even a negative. Ultimately, the goal should be to remove all aspects of capitalism and move towards a true socialist economy that's a mix of state and cooperative ownership. Doing these kinds of nationalization projects helps with the transition.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i would agree, but 30% or so of the gdp is in real estate. china cannot just lose a third of its economy.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't lose 30% of its economy when these companies become nationalized.