this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
929 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32302 readers
993 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captcha@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please elaborate because as far as I see you just dont like that framing because you think its counter productive messaging, not because its wrong.

[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because its not relevant. It HAPPENS to be the case now, but it's in no way a defining feature. Sure, I'm absolutely fine with that detail being described so, because it's true. But you minimized the analysis to that. "Framing" is ambiguous and I'm ignoring that, I guess you could call it framing, but your framing is irrelevant to my analysis

[–] captcha@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

Because its not relevant. It HAPPENS to be the case now,

It IS relevant because its the fundamental reason why we can say we'll get positive outcomes from this case. It was even baked into your explanation "ending global imperialism".

but the framing of "big vs small" is very ignorant

"Framing" is ambiguous and I'm ignoring that,

bruh