this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
539 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

39903 readers
463 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A simple question to this community, what are you self-hosting? It's probably fun to hear from each-other what services we are running.

Please mention at least the service (e.g. e-mail) and the software (e.g. postfix). Extra bonus points for also mentioning the OS and/or hardware (e.g. Linux Distribution, raspberry pi, etc) you are running on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jamoke@lemmy.themainframe.org 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • Lemmy Instance
  • VaultWarden - Password manager
  • Jellyfin - Movies/TV Shows
  • Roon / Roon ARC - Music
  • OneDev - Used to use Gitlab but couldn't afford the self-hosted instance anymore and want the paid features, which this mostly has.
  • Dokuwiki - Used to use as a wiki, switched to...
  • Trilium - Similar to Obsidian but open source.
  • Kavita - Comics/books
  • TubeArchivist - YouTube video downloader/viewer
  • PodGrab - Podcast manager
  • Wallabag - Website article saver/bookmarker etc. If anyone has a better suggestion for FOSS bookmark management please let me know!
  • Mealie - Recipe manager (grabs recipes from a ton of different sites)

I use TrueNAS Scale for my NAS and Ubuntu server for my VM's/home server. I probably am forgetting something, but, that's what's listed in my Portainer :).

[–] AccountForStuff@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

trillium sounds awesome, I love obsidian but was wanting something open source. plus this has some features I felt it was missing, thanks!!

[–] Jamoke@lemmy.themainframe.org 4 points 1 year ago

Happy to help! Trilium is really awesome, just the web based view/syncing with it's desktop app is a killer feature. If I lose internet for a second and I'm using the app it syncs the next time I'm connected and open it. A lot of the more "hidden" stuff and things you need to install plugins for in Obsidian come by default in Trilium as well.

[–] juandjara@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking of switching to trillium from obsidian too. Most important point for me here is mobile support and note sync. How does trillum web support mobile phones ?

[–] berryfairy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this list! Lots of new things to me that I can explore tonight!!

[–] mhewitt@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How has Scale been on Linux vs BSD? Any complaints or plug-in compatibility issues?

[–] Jamoke@lemmy.themainframe.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would go back if it was easy. The speed difference from just getting a listing of contents in a large directory over SMB is insane. It used to be instant and it takes like 10-15 seconds now. I'm not even using their app setup anymore, I gave up on it after a while because of a bunch of random issues with updates over time and switched to a dedicated box with Portainer installed. I really wish I could go back to core.

I'm sure they'll iron everything out but BSD is still king at the moment.

[–] mhewitt@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

That’s disappointing, thanks for the info. I had hoped with OpenZFS things would be improved, but sounds like native Linux performance just isn’t there yet.

[–] mhewitt@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

That’s disappointing, thanks for the info. I had hoped with OpenZFS things would be improved, but sounds like native Linux performance just isn’t there yet.