this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
382 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

58131 readers
4063 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists::Researchers call for tighter regulations following major age and race-based discrepancies in AI autonomous systems.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do lidar and infrared work equally on white and black people? Both are still optical systems, and I don't know how well black people reflect infrared light.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seriously no pun intended: infrared cameras see black-body radiation, which depends on the temperature of the object being imaged, not its surface chemistry. As long as a person has a live human body temperature, they're glowing with plenty of long-wave IR to see them, regardless of their skin melanin content.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I thought we were talking about near-IR cameras using active illumination (so, an IR spotlight).

I didn't think low-wave IR cameras are fast enough and have enough resolution to be used on a car. Every one I have seen so far gives you a low-res low-FPS image, because there just isn't enough long-wave IR falling into the lens.

You know, on any camera you have to balance exposure time and noise/resolution with the amount of light getting into the lens. If the amount of light decreases, you have to either take longer exposures (->lower FPS), decrease the resolution (so that more light falls onto one pixel), or increase the ISO, thereby increasing noise. Or increase the lens diameter, but that's not always an option.

And since long-wave IR has super little "light", I didn't think the result would work for cars, which do need a decent amount of resolution, high FPS and low noise so that their image recognition algos aren't confused.