this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
34 points (97.2% liked)

Experienced Devs

3928 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion amongst professional software developers.

Posts should be relevant to those well into their careers.

For those looking to break into the industry, are hustling for their first job, or have just started their career and are looking for advice, check out:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What is your opinion about full-stack teams? I'm referring to teams where the desire is for every member to competently contribute at every point in the stack.

  • Do they work?
  • What has been your experience?
  • Does team size and/or experience level inform your opinion?
  • Do you notice an increase/decrease in quality?
  • Do you notice an increase/decrease in team and product cohesion?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You mean people taking ages to release because the work is divided between multiple teams and each one is creating a slightly different feature?

Yes, I have seen that.

Or if you mean a team of generalists with an specialist here and there not suffering from this problem?

I have seen that too.

I have also seen people solve the specialization problem by making their own layer more general than it would technically need to be, and become about as productive as a full stack team. The interesting part is that I have only seen that done by generalists, so I really doubt a set of specialists-only teams can be really productive.

[–] tinker_james@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In your experience, is success dependent on each member (or most members) being T shaped?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's dependent on many members being T shaped. Not all, and I don't know if "most". But you need enough to handle the basic flow of the system and interact with all of the specialists.