this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
349 points (92.5% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1039 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mitch McConell says the quiet part out loud.

Exact full quote from CNN:

“People think, increasingly it appears, that we shouldn’t be doing this. Well, let me start by saying we haven’t lost a single American in this war,” McConnell said. “Most of the money that we spend related to Ukraine is actually spent in the US, replenishing weapons, more modern weapons. So it’s actually employing people here and improving our own military for what may lie ahead.”

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4085063

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mim@lemmy.sdf.org 131 points 1 year ago (129 children)

Russia invades a neighbour who dares to attempt to have stronger ties to the west.

West supplies neighbour with weapons to defend itself.

Tankies on Lemmy: "oh no, Russia is being oppressed"

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Angry libs on lemmy downplay CNN poll showing majority of Americans oppose more US aid for Ukraine

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US dares to coup a democratically elected government, and then its neighbor invades at the behest of people the new government were persecuting after two different ceasefires are broken by Ukraines puppet government.

Dronies be like "oh no our wholesome smol bean azov fighters are being oppressed"

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago (133 children)

At a 2008 summit, NATO stated that it would attempt to expand to include Georgia and Ukraine, despite Russia having stated that NATO membership for those countries was a red line for them. Georgia was immediately invaded by Russia in response. Imo this makes it clear that NATO membership for either of those countries was so unacceptable that Russia would rather invade.

If we assume that Russia (and Putin in particular) is acting violently and irrationally like a wild animal, why did NATO continue to agitate Russia when the only possible outcome would be violence? Surely a neutral or even Russia-aligned Ukraine would be preferable to a war-torn Ukraine? This is proof that the US and NATO don't care about the average person actually living in Ukraine, and indeed don't care about the Ukrainian state beyond it being a useful (and profitable) proxy against a geo-political rival.

To be clear, I'm not excusing Russia here, but geo-politics aren't about what's "fair" or "right", and if they were, the US would be a global pariah.

load more comments (133 replies)

You straight up butchered that straw man

He is in pieces

How could you do this

[–] Quimby@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

"And that's all I have to say about that." fedposting

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

You're commenting on an article explicitly saying the US isn't sending weapons for the purpose of defending Ukraine...

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Even some otherwise good regular leftists have absolute dogshit takes on Ukraine. It's like they're allergic to even being coincidentally on the same side as the US State Department that they start falling all over themselves to be like "Remember guys, US Bad," and start like saying that we should be pushing Ukraine to give up territory to appease Russia so they don't use nukes. When we already know because of Crimea that Putin will almost certainly just regroup and try again if they give him anything.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (122 replies)