this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43382 readers
1926 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fing3r@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Great Question. I'd go to the future, not sure how far tho.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I would too, maybe 200 years forward. I’m hoping by then most natural causes of death would be mostly figured out and poverty hopefully being a thing of the past.

[–] Noxvento@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People in the 1800s thought the same. It’s not going to get better.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we have figured out most causes of death from the 1800s don’t downplay the huge impact modern medicine has had!

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Because that benefits the people in power as well. Ending poverty is just not something they are interested in

We are doing a bit better now than we did in the 1800s though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)