this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
44 points (95.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53969 readers
1072 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Seems quite promising! I heard it could use more maturing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LocustOfControl@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a user, I don't want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn't use it.

Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that's just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps.

Something like Veilid would be more interesting.

Veilid wasn't released yet when I wrote that comment. It's definitely interesting.

I agree that IPFS is rather suboptimal for social media and self hosted stuff. The current main use case, being a place to store the data attached to NFTs accessed almost exclusively through public gateways, works fine though.