this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
414 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

58547 readers
4361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] talos@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago (2 children)

256TB? That's huge! How about an affordable 8TB SSD though? I ended up going with a HDD as a secondary drive because it was like a quarter of the price of high capacity SSDs.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have you checked prices lately?

[–] talos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I built my new PC around 2 months ago. Maybe they are cheaper elsewhere but here in Australia they are very expensive. :(

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, 8TB might still not be cheap, but I bought a few of those Crucial 4TB drives for $165 when B&H had their sale. Trying them out for a Proxmox datastore.

I still use spinning rust for long term storage.

[–] TigZip@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Can’t wait for affordable 16tb SSDs to be available. That’s really the only time I can see myself switch from spinning rust. Also looking forward to the for the power saving benefits too. 10 years maybe ?

[–] Zeron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For real. It's like SSD manufacturers are in cahoots with HDD manufacturers to never step on their turf(capacity.)

SSD manufacs keep chasing useless metrics like sequential write speed in consumer drives, when if they just chased capacity they could kill HDDs forever and we'd all be better off for it. Then again, i guess they'd also lose revenue since they don't nearly die as much as HDDs, so i guess there's that.

Or...they could keep with their current trend but actually focus on metrics that matter. Like lower que depth operations which actually make an operating system feel amazing to use like Q1T1. The difference between even an Intel Optane 905p and some of the newest fastest gen4 SSDs currently on the market is still crazy large in terms of how much better the OS feels to use moment to moment for me.