this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
904 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
4957 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The sicko in me hopes they spend the next two weeks linking every policymaker in the state to their pornography habits and just dump the whole dataset online. Yeah, it would probably counterproductive and not great for democracy but I wouldn’t it be the sickest burn of all time?

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ironically it would be so much easier to do that if they actually implemented the law they're suing over, which demands they record the ID of everyone who uses the site.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'd make themselves exempt without a second thought.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you expect them to do this... without verifying who they are?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not a member of the house or Senate so I don't know what they can do. But I'm sure they can have as many open doors as they're like.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They would just use a VPN like everyone else

[–] qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Malicious compliance, while reminding people exactly why they shouldn’t be so quick to give up their anonymity on the internet.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I see what you're saying about it not being good for democracy...we shouldn't have politicians making decisions based on their personal use, and trying to avoid scrutiny of that use...but at the same time, we have that anyway. Honestly, at this point, burn it all down. Make the entire apparatus of government so transparent that the shitheels currently in office can't justify staying on. Make it to where the only people who can function in elected positions are political monks.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I strongly support this and would activly do it if I had the means