this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers
50 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw this discussion brought up on a different thread and I though I'd get some more opinions on the matter.

The Beehaw community guidelines describe a place that's meant to be safe, friendly and encourages people to discuss their ideas in good faith. For the most part I feel like this community lives up to that; users of this instance are generally thoughtful with their responses. However, I don't feel like that level of quality extends to the users who post from other instances. Responses from those users are more likely to pendantic, overly argumentative, and unhelpful.

Now I may just be an elitist fuck so I'd like to hear your opinions on this. Does Beehaw benefit from federation? Do the community guidelines even matter if they don't apply to many of the people who engage with this instance? Am I just looking for a reason to complain?

EDIT: This post isn't a request for Beehaw to defederate btw. I just wanted to discuss the negatives of federation and what we can do to alleviate them :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is generalizing large amount of people, just because they signed to another instance a good contribution to anything?

[–] Tordoc@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This feels like a bad faith argument. OP correctly identifies that users from instances other than Beehaw tend to be more likely to engage in argumentative and pedantic commentary, which you prove in your interactions so far.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also OP recognized that it sounds elitist, which I initially just agreed with. Not sure why you interpret this as a bad faith argument.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That wasn't the argument that was pointed out as being clearly bad faith

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

It was the context of my response, which people assumed to be a bad faith argument.

[–] RichByy@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More likely ≠ all

They talked about a tendency, not every user from different instances than Beehaw.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago