this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
912 points (86.8% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
1981 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not gonna voluntarily give it back, so why not just take it like they did? Let's say they start flying rainbow flags, should the LGBT community just give up the rainbow flag? I've noticed a trend where the alt-right widely adopts a symbol and the left just kinda... let's them have it. Why? I don't get it. If you don't want them to have a symbol, then don't allow them to become the exclusive users of it.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been saying this for years. What happens is they let their leftist friends bully them into not using it for fear of appearing right wing, and the right wing wins it. Honestly if the right ever figures out they have this power it'll be...interesting...

[–] chomskysfave5@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Young people indoctrinated to socially pressure their peers into following a strict moral code. The parallels are so on-the-nose that it's almost funny.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

The Moral Majority horseshoe theory is real as fuck.

[–] theoretiker@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

What exactly do they win? What do left people lose? It's not like the LGBT movement is the rainbow flag. It's just a symbol, and if it weren't there'd be another one. This whole fighting for a thing makes sense only if there weren't infinite equivalent alternatives.

But to be fair it's really hard to co-opt the symbol of a wholly opposed group.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's basically what happened with the word "libertarian". It originally meant libertarian socialist.

We've been surrendering words to the right for at least a century and it hasn't gone well. Every time the public decides a right wing idea is trash, the right rebrands the idea.

They're coming for "anarchist" next with monarchism rebranded as "anarcho"-capitalism.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ancaps pretty much only exist in the US so elsewhere libertarian still means the original definition.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 1 points 1 year ago

Reason for me to emigrate #302

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A word cannot be defined as a subset of itself.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 1 points 1 year ago

It isn't. What we now call libertarian socialist used to just be called libertarian.