this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
111 points (91.7% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
3958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Gates-backed nuclear contender Terra Power aims to build dozens of UK reactors::A Bill Gates-backed clean energy player is hoping to build dozens of nuclear reactors in the UK and will compete with global rivals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The world would be a bit better if everyone flew coach or stayed home, but it would be a lot better if the developing world had access to lighting, air conditioning, washing machines, transportation, fertilizer, and desalinated water without a corresponding increase in carbon emissions.

Renewables (with storage and long-distance transmission) are part of the solution, but we need to invest in all viable forms of carbon-free energy like there's no tomorrow, because if we don't, then for a lot of people there won't be.

[–] zer0@thelemmy.club -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The world can't be better if the plan is to make things worst (planned obsolescence). Feeding these who got us there is not a solution to the problem

[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree that we should build more durable technology and reduce income inequality, but we need to fight the laws of physics first. Debate is a luxury granted by a stable civilization, which largely depends on a stable climate.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We'll eventually figure out nuclear fusion even in a post apocalyptic nuclear fallout world.

[–] zer0@thelemmy.club -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nuclear power is also a technology for a stable civilization not one ruled by corrupted politicians that play war with each others

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaporizhzhia_Nuclear_Power_Plant

[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Investing in nuclear power also means allowing engineers to improve the technology. There are plenty of reactor designs (mostly on paper) that can safely shut down without human intervention, which would make them much less of a liability in a warzone.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Let's save downvotes for comments that don't contribute (like zer0's first few).

While I still disagree with his later stuff, it's certainly more productive of a conversation.

I realize downvote != disagree is a fight we can never win, but it's still worth trying.

[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely agree with you on how planned obsolescence and consumerism is a huge issue. But we still need energy from something and this sounds like a great start.

I'm all about the three R's. Especially prioritizing the order they are in.

REDUCE and REUSE first, recycle only if needed.

[–] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Excuse me indeed, the 4 import R's