this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
9 points (64.5% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5310 readers
2 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
theloneforager@lemmy.ml
Chloe@lemmy.ml
9
The 7 reasons why nuclear energy is not the answer to solve climate change (eu.boell.org)
submitted 1 year ago by Gloomy@mander.xyz to c/green@lemmy.ml
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is a (slightly older) article about Nuclear Energy and climate change. It's a hottly debated topic in climate communities, so I thought some of you would enjoy to read it.

Another article that brings up some more points against nuclear power can be found here.

I'd be interested what you ppl think of the matter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] itmightbethew@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I am not an expert, nor do I love nuclear power. But as I understand it with renewables we need to solve the storage problem. Wind and solar intermittent, and battery options are terrible in efficacy, cost, and environmental impact. Plus the north american grid is old and built around power being always-on - there isn't (yet) the ability to shuffle power from areas with to areas without to the scale we'd need.

So I have a feeling that despite all these issues nuclear will be part of the solution. Lucikly it's so expensive and has such low public opinion that I doubt governments will go "all-in" on nuclear any time soon.