this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
191 points (86.9% liked)

GenZedong

4186 readers
25 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] axont@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's probably a measure of functional literacy, like the ability to read through a page of information and understand it fluently. Someone who is able to sound words out one by one wouldn't be considered functionally literate, for instance. They'd lack the ability to reasonably get through a text using reading as a tool. Instead reading would be an obstacle.

They might know a few words they need to know, like writing their own name, or reading some road signs, but they'd be unable to get through a novel or textbook. They might even know how to recite the alphabet or do math.

I used to teach adult literacy in the US and I've met hundreds of illiterate adults. Most of our studies showed 87% literacy but I could believe 79% too depending on the methodology and definition of literate.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s probably a measure of functional literacy

it's too high for a functional literacy. Even in well educated country like Poland with 99% formal literacy the functional literacy reach around 60%, so in USA it bound to be even less.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks, that's depressing