this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
394 points (97.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54627 readers
534 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a well-intentioned yet dangerous move to fight online fraud, France is on the verge of forcing browsers to create a dystopian technical capability. Article 6 (para II and III) of the SREN Bill would force browser providers to create the means to mandatorily block websites present on a government provided list.

I don't agree that it's "well-intentioned" at all but the article goes on to point out the potential for abuse by copyright holders.

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/64123

[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, that's not actually working, but VPN sales are going up.

[–] DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

And tor activity too

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasdfsadfasfasdf

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Which can be easily circumvented.

[–] Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The main sites yes. Others are ignoring it

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasdfsadfasfasdf