this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
276 points (97.9% liked)

Fediverse

17683 readers
70 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

URL seems to be wrong ... here's the correct URL

cross-posted from: https://merv.news/post/82405

It will be open source, end to end encrypted using Signal’s double ratchet encryption protocol, and he plans to make it easy for fediverse platforms to integrate it. The beta will release later this month.

He’s also the creator of https://fedidb.org btw

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] min_fapper@iusearchlinux.fyi 28 points 1 year ago (12 children)

What's wrong with just using matrix?

[–] featured@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you care about privacy and security, matrix has some glaring flaws. The biggest IMO is not currently encrypting metadata, so who you talk to and when is plaintext. The signal protocol encrypts everything, including the meta data.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does the server know who to deliver a message to if the metadata is encrypted?

[–] Dr_Evil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't this largely mitigated by running your own homeserver?

[–] lps@masto.1146.nohost.me 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@featured
Better yet, check out simplex chat https://simplex.chat/
It's the best of all...user friendly as well:)

@min_fapper

[–] imattau@dcentralisedmedia.com 1 points 1 year ago

@lps

And it appears to have support on @yunohost - So self hosting should be easy 👍
@featured @min_fapper

[–] pkulak@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I care about privacy and security so much that I don’t let a third-party own my chats, encrypted or not. I’m fine with unencrypted metadata on my server that’s in my own home.

[–] thomcat@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

That's just privacy, not security.

load more comments (6 replies)