Finally out π
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
247 points (89.5% liked)
Lemmy Apps
5408 readers
1 users here now
A home for discussion of Lemmy apps and tools for all platforms.
RULES:
- No spamming
- Be nice and have fun
- Follow the general lemmy.world rules
An extensive list of Lemmy apps is available here:
Visit our partner Communities!
Lemmy Plugins and Userscripts is a great place to enhance the Lemmy browsing experience. !plugins@sh.itjust.works
Lemmy Integrations is a community about all integrations with the lemmy API. Bots, Scripts, New Apps, etc. !lemmy_integrations@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Lemmy Bots and Tools is a place to discuss and show off bots, tools, front ends, etc. youβre making that relate to lemmy. !lemmy_dev@programming.dev
Lemmy App Development is a place for Lemmy builders to chat about building apps, clients, tools and bots for the Lemmy platform. !lemmydev@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The subscription model is not a great idea considering lemmy is not as popular as reddit.
I hate ads and will never download an app that has ads for a platform that doesn't have ads, just so I have to pay to get rid of ads (which of course includes tracking you for the best ads).
"No added ads" is a non-feature.
I understand people wanting to support the dev, but is their code so bad that they really have to add ads to make money? Apollo never had ads.
iOS users are more likely to pay for apps. ad-supported is common. Of course you could so both.
I'm a dev myself. I'd never disrespect my userbase by adding ads and tracking to my products. Instead, they can choose to pay for real features.
Edit: But Sync are free to do as they wish. Just weird that they add ads to an ad-free platform. You're paying for the problem they created, not for innovation.
What's the connection between code quality and adding ads to make money?
You can either charge for good code or for no-ads.
Charging for no-ads on an opensource platform is just sad. Why not enrich instead?
Edit: Apollo was made for Reddit, some smug corp. and even they didn't have ads. Ads on opensource is misusing opensource.
I don't agree with the premise that you can only charge for one or the other though. The Sync dev has a track record of putting out a very performant app for close to a decade. A one time ad removal fee and an optional subscription is pretty reasonable IMO.
I get the philosophical problems you have with it though. In the end I'm still using it because I paid like $5 none years ago and got way more than my money's worth with it on Reddit. The ad unlock is more expensive here, but it's probably an early adopter tax with the user base here being a tiny fraction of Reddit.
As for Apollo, I'm not sure how many Apple users pay for apps but if I had to guess they probably outnumber android users easily.
It also feels dirty to use an app only available in the Apple ecosystem as a paragon of open source ideals. That's a pretty adaptive Stallman meter.
Ads shouldn't even be a topic of discussion. Before Sync there were no ads related to Lemmy. How much harder can you piss in the face of all other people contributing.
If you read my comment you know I never said I expect anyone to work for free. Don't put those words in my mouth, if it is what you are thinking yourself.
Yes I prefer up front payment over ads (in the EU you have a right to withdrawal your purchase if you regret).
I prefer not having tech at all over having Google's ads. Even 1 ad before being able to remove those ads, on an ad free platform. Any developer working with Google ads is not trustworthy.
Instead, support and donate to your instance. Those people work just as hard if not harder.
Just a heads up, Sync's just been updated with a one-time payment for permanently removing ads. The Sync dev is just one guy working on it full time, so I think the pricing ($20/β¬20) is fair.
That's great. Enjoy it.