this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
874 points (98.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17063 readers
43 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sordid@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In defensive terms, no, not really. They had to build it like this because these aren't really walls per se, it's just brick lining on the outside of an earthen mound, and mounds are, well, mound-shaped. https://gomadnomad.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Bukharas-Ark-Palace.jpg

[–] BB69@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would’ve made siege ladders harder to set up.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Who needs siege ladders when you can just climb up the damn wall?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’d think there’d be a reason beyond construction requirements, though—otherwise someone in the past 1,500 years would have replaced it with a more conventional wall.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

They did. This is only the oldest, innermost fortification in the city. AFAIK additional layers of walls were build around it later.