this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
2320 points (97.0% liked)

Reddit

17806 readers
494 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I mean, perhaps in the most general sense that is technically true. For example, there have been cases about this that have come from parents taking pictures of their kids in the bathtub, even if the charges were eventually dropped. If that particular court case had gone differently, it might've set a very destructive precedent that served only to rip apart families.

Still, 99% of the cases that produce this material are done so in an exploitative and abusive context; definitely not arguing with that. No idea what Aaron was talking about in that particular link, but this is the one counterexample that I think of that is valid, assuming it went a different direction in court.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The link makes a (imo pretty valid) case for decriminalization of CP “consumption”, at least in cases where it’s not provably voluntary.

Sharing though is a different issue altogether and there’s absolutely no way someone sharing that stuff on the internet is doing it unintentionally.

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's a very specific case that needs to be taken in a very narrow context; it's essentially an innocent mistake that needs to be recognized as such. The moment you step outside of that, I see no reasonable arguments for decriminalizing anything.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thing is it’s very hard to prove what’s an innocent mistake and what’s intentional behavior if we’re just talking about viewing. I personally think that alone shouldn’t guarantee more than getting put on a watchlist.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Parents taking pictures of kids in the bathtub is evil and I would try to put my parents in jail for it if I could.

I don't really think it's something people should do, but I can honestly see it happening to ordinary people if they aren't thinking about what they're doing.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

99% of the cases that produce this material are done so in an exploitative and abusive context

99%? Man you can just go full 100%

The only exception would be the r34 drawings if you consider them to be on the same level

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Medical material. Keepsake photos of your newborn. A minor sending a nude pic to their minor partner.

Plenty of situations where technically illegal material is made with no malice at all.

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Picking and choosing isn't the game I want to play, I'm just highlighting that there are circumstances that can result in actually innocent people doing things without thinking. Pornographic content of any kind (drawings or otherwise) that depicts underage people in any context is something I think should be illegal and avoided at all costs, but I'm highlighting that there is edge-cases in everything.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

And I just said you didn't have to use 99% and could go full 100%