this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
98 points (95.4% liked)
science
14848 readers
787 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.
2024-11-11
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The name "plus" immediately made me think of subscriptions.
I would rather they name it NASA Explore, NASA More, NASA Now...
Same, I had a knee-jerk angry reaction until I saw that it was free.
The name was certainly poorly chosen. My first reaction was exactly the same, with additional disappointment at this being NASA, who I always considered benign in making their science, missions etc. available.
It's the Federal government... by law, everything they make is required to be Public Domain.
If they tried to charge for this, I'd be more than "disappointed." I'd be pissed and calling my Congressman to complain!
That makes me wonder.. Does NASA make any money from licensing for all the tshirts and memorabilia you see everywhere?.. Or can any company decide to make NASA swag without licensing?
Just last week, I visited Kennedy Space Center and bought my kids souvenir t-shirts from one of the gift shops there. They were quite a bit less expensive than I expect from souvenir shirts, so they’re at least profiting less.
That being said: the place is AMAZING! The technology, the people, the inspiration! There is so much to see and experience! —- we spent two full days, could have spent a third, and that is without a launch
I was about to come in here with "sigh. Yet another streaming service" but this has me pleasantly surprised.