My Problems with Mastodon
Even with growing pains accommodating an influx of new users, Lemmy has made it clear that a federated social media site can be nearly as good as the original thing. I joined Lemmy, and it exceeded my expectations for a Reddit alternative run by an independent team.
These expectations were originally pretty low when Mastodon, the popular federated Twitter alternative, was the only federated social media I had experience with. After using Lemmy, Mastodon seems to be missing basic features. I initially believed these were just shortcomings of federated social media.
-
Likes aren't counted by users outside your instance, and replies don't seem to be counted at all (beyond 0, 1, 1+), leading to posts that look like they have way more boosts (retweets) than likes or replies:
This incentivizes people to just gravitate toward the biggest instance more than people already do. My guess is that self-hosting a mastodon instance would also not be ideal, since the only likes you'll see are your own.
-
There's really only one effective ways to find popular or 'trending' posts. There's the explore tab which has 'posts', and 'tags' sections.
The 'posts' section shows some trending posts across your instance and all the instances that it's federated with, this is the one I use it the most.
The 'tags' section is a lot like the trending tab on Twitter, but it's reserved just for hashtags, which I guess isn't a huge deal, but it feels like a downgrade. However, I do like the trend line it shows next to each tag!
The 'Local' and 'Federated' tabs are a live feed of post from your home instance and all the other instances, respectively. I feel these are pretty useless and definitely don't warrant their own tabs. Having a local trending tab for seeing popular posts on your instance would be more interesting.
-
The search bar basically doesn't work, is this just me???
-
This one is more minor and more specific to a Twitter alternative, but when looking at a user's follows, you'll only see the one's on your home instance but for some reason this rule doesn't apply to followers.
From what I've heard, a lot of these issues are intentional in order to create a healthier social media experience. Things like less focus on likes, reduces a hivemind mentality, addiction, things like that (I couldn't find a source for this, if anyone has one confirming or disproving this please lmk).
Why this is a Problem
Mastodon seems to have two goals: To be an example of how a federated alternative to Twitter can work well, and to be a healthier social media experience. It's not obvious, but I think these goals conflict with each other. A lot of the features that are removed in the pursuit of a healthier social media will be perceived as the shortcomings of federation as a concept.
In my eyes, Mastodon's one main goal should be proving federated social media as a whole to the public, by being a seamless, familiar, full-featured alternative to Twitter. For me, Lemmy has done that for Reddit, upvotes are counted normally, you can see trending posts locally and globally same with communities, and the search function works! All its shortcomings aren't design flaws, and I fully expect them to be fixed down the road as it matures.
As annoying as Jack Dorsey is, I have high hopes for BlueSky.
Honestly, Lemmy and Kbin are better set up for that purpose. Determining popularity in a way that's not easy to game requires a fancy algorithm. Bots and voting rings are easy to set up. Lemmy's sorting has been criticised for pushing ancient posts to the front page and preventing that is very hard (especially without making the server software expensive to run).
Everyone has a different definition of "popular". You probably don't want stuff that gets loads of replies because it's offensive or a terrible take to pop up everywhere, so to make sure you only get good posts, you need to do things like sentiment analysis of replies you base your popularity algorithm on. You probably also don't want to hide outcries/controversy about important people and topics, so you need to match that with the sentiment of the topic at large, and from there the list goes on.
As a workaround, you can browse hashtags. Hashtags will usually get you accounts you can follow (and add to one of your topic specific lists). Get a few active accounts on a topic and the network effect will get you tons of popular posts through boosts and replies, and suddenly you've created your own algorithm!
Or you could do the most upvoted post minus its age, like a lot of sites still do. AFAIK hacker news does nothing fancy to its "algorithm"
That's what Lemmy does! Well, sort of. The orange reddit algorithm is very similar to the Lemmy algorithms. In my experience, Lemmy is slightly better than HN (fewer posts that end up on top without any comments), but both only work when there is much more content to rank than there are pages to fill.
I think Reddit's algorithms are much better for tricking people into staying around (for me, anyway). That approach doesn't work for something like Twitter/Mastodon that doesn't really do "voting". Almost all toots have little to no interaction, even the good ones. Twitter's algorithm has been documented and large parts (but not the important weights) have been open sourced, but I don't think that can be implemented well on Mastodon.