this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
1550 points (98.8% liked)

Memes

45899 readers
1794 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zyansheep@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sure, but at least companies can be competed with and if they get too big, are subject to government scrutiny. On the other hand, its really hard to control a large population of landowners and speculators who have a personal incentive to do whatever they can to increase the perceived price of their owned land.

Have you ever heard of Google? There is no such thing as 'too big' anymore. Hasn't been for a long time.

[–] peeonyou@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

too big? government scrutiny?

what century is this?

[–] TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is a very Polyannaish take and places way too much faith in a "free market" and government oversight. There is no free market when we are regularly allowing companies to get massive and become practical monopolies. When was the last time a company faced serious repercussions for getting too big?

There is certainly some more competition among smaller, local businesses. And the price of land/real estate can be an issue for them. But I would also ask to see how much the business owner is making in relation to their employees.

All that being said, I would like to see landownership completely overhauled, if not abolished.