this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Fedia Discussions
1 readers
2 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is something I have been wondering; but does that mean kbin/this instance is not involved at all?
For the post in question, the original url is https://feddit.uk/post/771973 , a lemmy instance. OP is asking why it isn't getting sent to rabbitea.rs, another lemmy instance. Is
feddit.uk
responsible for sending it there? But how would it know aboutrabbitea.rs
subscribers? And surely the destination magazine must be involved somehow to run rules on like, banned users? otherwise that means any external user banned by fedia could continue to post forever with no way to stop them and it would still federate out everywhereYes, this doesn't make sense. How I thought it worked is that the originating server would push the new article to the home instance, and the other instances then pull from there (or the home server pushes; whatever, same net effect). If that isn't how it works, I don't see how it can work, as every server which posts to a magazine would need to know who subscribes to it. Certainly in the case of Mastodon, it doesn't have a concept of this, yet can post to communities/magazines and the comments federate out (maybe comments work differently though? There doesn't appear to be a problem with comments as far as I can tell)
@e569668
If feddit.uk doesn't know about rabbitea.rs, then it won't send it there. The originating instance is responsible for sending it out, but it can only send to instances it knows are subscribed. This can result in some instances not getting new content if it originates on an instance other than the one that is the "home" for a magazine.
That depends. It depends on if the "home" instance federates out blocks. I don't actually know if kbin federates out blocks (many Fediverse platforms don't actually because it's used as a vector for harassment and dogpiling and other very harmful behaviors), but the 2 cases are as follows:
In this scenario, instances that receive the block will behave as you might expect: they won't allow the blocked user to view the content in the magazine/community but will allow other users to view it. They also will not accept content into their local copy of the magazine from the blocked user.
Note: This is partially why the mod_log can be viewed. I'm not 100% sure of the details, but the home instance moderation decisions should be visible on other instances (or at least by visiting the magazine on the "home" instance itself) and moderators/admins should be able to take similar actions on their own local-copy of the magazine.