I've written papers where I just cited the articles that supported my arguments and didn't do a full analysis of the literature. It's a common practice in academia. Logic is better at convincing people.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, your logic has been spectacularly unconvincing. And my continual exhortations for you to offer a single shred of evidence in support of your position have gone ignored, so... honestly my conclusion is you indeed have no evidence and no logic. Why are you even still replying if you have nothing to offer other than conspiracy theories and bad takes?

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I'm just entertained you're spending more time arguing than me than searching out a counter to your own argument. I do my research on both sides of an issue before sharing my opinion. You're just hiding behind a few links and foaming at the mouth that I haven't shared any links. Maybe if I'm bored this weekend I'll go through my KMS and find some citations for you since this isn't the common sense I thought it was.