this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
68 points (97.2% liked)

Linux

48364 readers
927 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've come across Red Hat allot lately and am wondering if I need to get studying. I'm an avid Ubuntu server user but don't want to get stuck only knowing one distro. What is the way to go if i want to know as much as I can for use in real world situations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ubuntu, RedHat, AWS Linux, Arch. Honestly distros in production are pretty similar since they're all headless and pretty pared-down. If you just know the logistics of a few package managers and init systems you'll be good.

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm surprised to see arch on your list, I know everything runs in containers now but arch seems way too unstable O_o

By unstable I don't mean "buggy", but "you will have to adapt to new major version of package XXX or you can't fetch updates anymore, so no security patches anymore".

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I never ran into this so I don’t really know what you’re talking about

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are probably not an IT Admin. Never heard about any server being deployed on Arch anywhere.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a devops professional, not IT. I've managed thousands of servers both in-cloud and in-datacenter. That includes Arch servers managed via Chef.

Now you've heard about it.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So whats the point of a unstable bleeding edge Arch server, seriously curious. Also if you are not IT than I don't know what IT is, lol.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 0 points 1 year ago

I didn’t find it more unstable or bleeding edge than anything else. All upgrades had to be tested and scripted anyway so the process for upgrading stuff was basically the same as any other distro. I honestly never ran into any of the problems people talked about here.

As for why it was chosen, the person in charge liked it and used it personally.

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You mean you never received any major package update on arch ? 😛

More seriously, it depends on what we are talking about, if everything runs in container I agree that it kinda doesn't matter, you will just have a more up to date kernel, but it is stable enough.

Other peoples on this thread are talking about actual system dependancies, for example installing a postgres server from official repo. On this example it would require a database migration as soon as a major postgres version is released, which means some downtime and non-scheduled maintainance.