this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37634 readers
377 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BobQuasit@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All this has me wondering. Lemmy and other fediverse sites should be resistant to enshittification. But how could American corporations screw that up? Could they start their own servers and instances, and somehow make them dominant? Or would that not be worth it to them?

It seems to me that capitalism has pretty much been trying to take over everything, with a lot of success. So I find myself wondering if it could happen here.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google Chat and Facebook Messenger used to do XMPP. You could message each other cross platform, as well as host your own service. Then when they got big enough, they pulled their interoperability and messaging only worked inside their platform. With the European DMA coming into effect soon it'll be harder for big companies to fuck up such networks (in fact, they will have to allow external access if they're of sufficient size) but it has happened before and it will happen again.

[–] luna@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Apple's iChat (precursor to Messages.app) used to do XMPP, too. I don't think it federated, or if it did it was very short-lived, but all the big tech companies with chat services got their start with XMPP. It's almost like it's a great set of tools for communicating, which, sadly and ironically, open source tech seems to have moved on from. To be fair, I far prefer Matrix's JSON to XMPP's XML, but it's a little disappointing that everyone forgets about XMPP.

[–] luna@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We're kind of already seeing it with Mastodon. The official app strongly pushes people toward mastodon.social which is a radioactive dumpster fire. And this isn't even corporate America, it's just the folks who own the name.

[–] naoseiquemsou@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is mastodon.social so bad?

[–] luna@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The biggest issue is that they don't really moderate, so hate speech and bigotry have a greater presence there. I specifically remember a situation where multiple people were reporting things and it took them days (maybe a week or more? I can't remember, but certainly several days) to take it down. And this happens pretty regularly.

[–] C4Phoenix@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is hoping lemmy is easier to moderate and doesnt end up like that.

[–] luna@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

There are several good mastodon instances, just not mastodon.social. Moderating is hard and you have to actually do it and not be afraid it's censorship. Oh, and not being a fascist helps. I'm beginning to wonder about the mastodon.social admins.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mastodon had to pick a default instance because so many people complained about the server picking process. People are used to "one service, one app" and backed out when they had to make a choice.

And, as any social network has shown, if you gather enough people on a platform, your platform will turn to shit. It's an unfortunate side effect of a relatively small yet vocal part of humanity being absolute assholes.

[–] luna@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your points are valid and you're not wrong, but it's exacerbated by the poor / lack of moderation as I commented elsethread. You can have a large number of users and still have a tolerable, even useful and pleasant, experience--r/askhistorians is my favorite example of internet moderation.

Reddit has attracted plenty of moderators but on the fediverse those moderators are often lacking in my experience. Some servers have strict moderation (which I'm a big fan of) but there are many people who consider their abuse being removed an infringement of their freedom of speech.

With the fediverse working across servers, every server needs moderators or you'll have trolls or general shitheads moving from server to server, ruining the experience for everyone. I've set up an instance just for myself and I'm already considering writing a script that syncs up the blacklists of various Lemmy servers because I don't want to deal with that crap every time I open a thread.