sh.itjust.works Main Community

7713 readers

2 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

Do you guys think local only communities should be a thing? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by KyRoLen@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm talking like communities exclusive to an instance where only instance members can participate in. This would be great for communities like The Agora.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

the fediverse community at large, but i’m guessing you got that and you’re asking the question for other reasons, so what are you actually asking?

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What authority does "the fediverse community at large" possess?

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

authority? none… but instance admins can defederate, and that has the potential to be powerful

this, however, has nothing to do with the original point:

where there is a can there is always a should or should not… the fediverse has plenty of should or should nots

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Yes - in the broadest, simply practical sense, there are always shoulds and should nots.

But just as you knew that I wasn't simply asking for a clarification regarding the makeup of that "we," I know that you don't actually believe that that broadest sense of the terms "should" and "should not" is the one I intended when I used them.