this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
62 points (93.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers
470 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Indonesian moving to Australia soon, I'm just concerned my laptop/phone will be checked for pirated content.

The general rule of thumb I've seen around the internet is "encrypt your drive", which is easy enough. But the other approach typically says "bring a burner phone / laptop" which of course isn't viable in my case.

Can anyone confirm on the legitimacy of these claims? I know I pirate light (""light"" compared to the vets here), but I'm just so paranoid that I could be held up and sent back home, because this might be my only shot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gizzle@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it a crime though? Suspicious is irrelevant if no laws are being broken

[–] apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You can be legally compelled to give access to data in Australia, this includes decryption keys and biometrics.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't be daft. Suspicious is not irrelevant when you're trying to clear immigration after a long flight.

Suspicious behaviour is, not surprisingly, a criteria which law enforcement considers when deciding whether detainment and more invasive searches are appropriate under the circumstances.

After a long flight who want's to be stuck in an interrogation room for hours debating the finer points of personal liberties and privacy... all because you don't want to decrypt your pirate collection of the marvel cinematic universe, which is not illegal to have in your possession anyway.

Is it a crime not to provide access to encrypted data? I honestly don't know, I imagine it's a complex legal question which depends on the circumstances. Even if you may lawfully decline, they could lawfully detain you while obtaining a court order.

[–] gizzle@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't even have to talk to the police in the first place. If they ask about an encrypted drive, just don't answer

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure mate, you try that next time you're going through immigration.

[–] gizzle@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Will do. I wouldn't be committing any other crimes so would have literally nothing to worry about.

Better yet, use a hidden partition.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A hidden partition is entirely different proposition as you have plausible deniability, and you're right - if you really had to pass immigration with it this is the way to do it.

That said, it's just not worth it for a tv series or what not. Just delete it and download it again.

[–] gizzle@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I'd rather not have some cuntface look through my personal data, thanks

[–] Gutotito@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better yet, use a hidden partition.

That'd be my suggestion. I can't imagine that the average airport security goon is going to check the reported size of the drive against the hardware specs as part of a normal inspection.

[–] gizzle@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AFAIK that information isn't even visible with veracrypt, correct me if I'm wrong though

Dont think it is, aslong as the container is not mounted