this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
443 points (96.6% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gbagginsthe3rd@aussie.zone 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn’t really go into the reasons for the price difference?? I doubt kerosene subsidies counts for everything?

Btw I like trains and think we should ban a lot of flights that can be serviced with quick alternatives

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was something about France banning domestic flights that take less than 2(or 3?) hours by train.

Which makes a shit ton of sense. The same stretch is not gonna be shorter by plane when you factor in the extra ceremonies you have to attend both before and after the flight, and the time it takes to get to and from wherever the airport is.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago

Such short flights would be mostly connecting flights, so the check-in and customs overhead is a fixed constant anyway.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

think we should ban a lot of flights that can be serviced with quick alternatives

Doing that without actually bringing down the train fares would be frustrating. Budget airline tickets in Europe are ludicrously cheap.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

Good point, because we rely on what little competition there is to get reasonable pricing.