this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
240 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30552 readers
338 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
Whom@beehaw.org
The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org
chloyster@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
240
I used to be concerned about a game being too short. Now I worry that it will be too long. (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by eragontalley@lemmy.zip to c/gaming@beehaw.org
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title mostly describes how I'm feeling now.

When I was younger, my main worry when deciding what game to buy and play next was that the game wouldn't be able to keep me entertained until I can buy another game.

Now I have a backlog of almost 100 games that I own and haven't played yet (although some come from bundles, not all are worth playing). My new concern when I'm playing a game is whether or not the time I put into the game is well spent.

I used to really like the idea of games where it would take me 100s of hours to get to 100% completion, but now I tend to almost avoid playing them entirely even if I know I don't care about completion anymore.

I don't think I'm alone in this, but what I'm really wondering is if this is a result of getting older? Or is it because the gaming space itself has changed?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have a system.

For every hour of play a game offers, I'm willing to pay $1.

[–] specklespacle@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

this is a really terrible system. there are a lot of fantastic games that are short and more than $2.

[–] Almace@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I agree. A lot of it for me is the quality of the time spent. I'd rather pay $10 for high quality six hours of gameplay, then play $40 for 60 hours of gameplay but like 30 of those hours are very low quality.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, I know, but getting them on sale at the price I want is inevitable.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why this became popular. I'll easily spend £8 to watch a 1.5 hour film so why would I limit myself on a game I could enjoy if it's short. I just play games I think I'll like. I'm not picking up a 100 hour multiplayer because it's better value

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Well, for me, that's just how I define a good value, and thanks to Epic and Steam, sales happen all the time, so getting the game I want in the price range I want it is just a matter of waiting a little longer. No big deal.