this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

News

7 readers
7 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

In-N-Out will bar employees in five states from wearing masks unless they have a doctor’s note, according to internal company emails leaked on social media last week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Requiring a doctor’s note is also a burden in terms of time and money. Many people don’t have a primary care physician or one who is readily available,” Stone wrote in a column for Forbes this week. “And requiring proof of a disability might be considered a violation of the Americans with Disability Act, depending on how one interprets masking as a request for accommodation.”

[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it’s a small burden in terms of time and money, yet I won’t dispute that even a small burden is still a burden.

My understanding is that the capitalist business owners continually make the complaint “no one wants to work anymore.” If they’re all making that same complaint, it seems that if I no longer wanted to work for In-N-Out anymore, there’s likely high demand for workers at every other fast food place.

I’ve never been to an In-N-Out but I can’t imagine too many of their employees that have a desire to continue to wear a mask are going to be in conflict with their unwavering desire to work for In-N-out, they’ll just go work somewhere else.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they’ll just go work somewhere else.

This implies there are 1) similar employers 2) in a similar location, and 3) that are looking for workers, which isn't a guarantee.

And even if there was, that puts the burden of looking for a new job on the workers. Why should it be their responsibility? We don't have to get to this part of the conversation in the first place: In N Out shouldn't be banning masks in the first place, regardless of what contingencies are available or unavailable to their employees.

[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree that they shouldn’t be banning masks, but they are. Complaining about it isn’t a solution.